Black Holes with Ravenous Appetites Define Type I Active Galaxies
New research suggests that the central black holes in Type I and Type II active galaxies consume matter at different rates, upending popular theory
For decades, astronomers have tried to pin down why two of the most common types of active galaxies, known as Type I and Type II galaxies, appear different when observed from Earth. Although both galaxy types host voracious supermassive black holes known as active galactic nuclei, which actively swallow matter and emit massive amounts of radiation, Type I galaxies appear brighter to astronomers’ telescopes.
New research from an international team of astronomers, with contributions from the University of Maryland, makes a major modification to a popular theory called the unified model. According to this model, the active nuclei of Type I and Type II galaxies have the same fundamental structure and energetic profile, but appear different solely because the galaxies point toward Earth at different angles. Specifically, Type II galaxies are tilted such that they are obscured by their own rings of dust, making Type I galaxies appear brighter by comparison.
The new results, published September 28, 2017, in the journal Nature, suggest that Type I and Type II galaxies do not just appear different—they are, in fact, very different from each other, both structurally and energetically. The key factor that distinguishes Type I and Type II galaxies is the rate at which their central black holes consume matter and spit out energy, according to the researchers.
“The unified model has been the prevailing wisdom for years. However, this idea does not fully explain the differences we observe in galaxies’ spectral fingerprints, and many have searched for an additional parameter that fills in the gaps,” said Richard Mushotzky, a professor of astronomy at UMD and a co-author of the study. “Our new analysis of X-ray data from NASA’s Swift Burst Alert Telescope suggests that Type I galaxies are much more efficient at emitting energy.”
To conduct the study, Mushotzky and his colleagues re-examined data from 836 active galaxies detected by NASA’s Swift Burst Alert Telescope that strongly emit high-energy, or “hard,” X-rays—the same X-rays that medical technicians use to visualize the human skeleton.
To measure the mass and growth rate of these galaxies’ active nuclei—the supermassive black holes at the galaxies’ centers— the researchers used data from 12 different ground-based telescopes spread across the globe to complement the data from the Swift satellite.
The first clues to indicate a fundamental difference between Type I and Type II galaxies came in 2008, when former graduate student Lisa Winter (M.S. ’05, Ph.D. ’08, astronomy), now a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, reported similar results in her doctoral thesis. Mushotzky and his students and collaborators worked to verify the findings with a larger sample size.
“The current incarnation of this project began in 2009, as part of my doctoral work at UMD, and has radically grown with the help of more than 40 researchers across the globe,” said Michael Koss (M.S. ’07, Ph.D. ’11, astronomy), a research scientist at Eureka Scientific, Inc. and a co-author of the paper. “When I started out, I spent a month of lonely nights by myself at the Kitt Peak National Observatory observing a few dozen galaxies. I never dreamed we would eventually expand to such a large sample, enabling us to answer many amazing scientific questions for the first time.”
By comparing differences in the X-ray spectra between Type I and Type II galaxies, the researchers concluded that, regardless of which way the galaxy faces Earth, the central black holes in Type I galaxies consume matter and emit energy much faster compared with the black holes at the center of Type II galaxies.
“Our results suggest this has a lot to do with the amount of dust that sits close to the central black hole,” said Mushotzky, who is also a fellow of the Joint Space-Science Institute. “Type II galaxies have a lot more dust close to the black hole, and this dust pushes against the gas as it enters the black hole.”
For decades, astronomers preferentially studied Type II galaxies, largely because the active nuclei of Type I galaxies are very bright, making it difficult to see the stars and gas clouds that constitute the rest of the galaxy. Because the unified model suggested that all active galaxies were fundamentally the same, astronomers focused their efforts on the galaxies that host Type II active nuclei because they are easier to observe.
“But now, because our results suggest that the two types of galaxies are indeed fundamentally different, it is likely that a lot of researchers will re-evaluate their data and take another look at Type I galaxies,” Mushotzky said. “By putting us on a path to better understand the differences between the galaxies that host Type I and Type II active nuclei, this work will help us better understand how supermassive black holes influence the evolution of their host galaxies.”
This research was led by Claudio Ricci of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile and the Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy. The data was collected by a team led by UMD alumnus Mike Koss (M.S. ’07, Ph.D. ’11, astronomy), who is currently a research scientist at Eureka Scientific, Inc. For more information on the survey and the research team, please visit www.bass-survey.com
This research was supported by NASA (Award No. NNH16CT03C); the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS; Award No. XDB09030102); the Swiss National Science Foundation (Award Nos. PP00P2 138979, PP00P2 166159, and PZ00P2 154799/1); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award No. 11473002); the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Award No. 2016YFA0400702); the Chilean Ministry of Economy, Development, and Tourism (Award No. IC120009); the Chilean Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT; Award Nos. 1141218 and 1160999); the Chilean Centro de Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA; Award No. Basal-CATA PFB–06/2007); the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT; Award No. 17K05384); the European Research Council (Award No. 340442); and the China-CONICYT fund. The content of this article does not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations.
Media Relations Contact:
Matthew Wright, 301-405-9267, email@example.com
About the College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences
The College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences at the University of Maryland educates more than 7,000 future scientific leaders in its undergraduate and graduate programs each year. The college's 10 departments and more than a dozen interdisciplinary research centers foster scientific discovery with annual sponsored research funding exceeding $150 million.